Lord of War and New Thought of Crime Movie Review

Lord of struggle and New Thought of Crime - Movie Review ExampleNo one takes into account millions of human beings lives killed by the arms, which is sold to contrastive countries by such guys, as Orlov. There is no fearfulness and emotions, thither is only money. A group of people, such as Orlov, do non have moral norms and their aberrant behavior is poignant and devastating for the new-fashioned society. Cruel and soulless money-gaining machines Still, if to consider that modern g everywherenments chose military shipway of doing their business, then the Orlovs be only if dummies in their games. Therefore, the modern world is rather debatable and makes people take in for different means to keep their head above the water. For the contemporaries, crime has turned into the means to survive and it is not surprising at all. Sometimes people have no other choice but to cast crime, small or big simply in order to stay alive. The globalized world is cruel and there is a need to shift the accents of survival different means of earning money have all just resulted in a strong want to survive. The main prototype of Orlov is the Russian man lord Bout, who lives unrestrained in Moscow, but he is sought by different agencies all over the world. It is a controversial mentality of post-Soviet countries. An enormous quantity of military hardware is ranging from bullets and tanks to nuclear warheads (Viktor Bout Arms Traders and Lord of War). ... Thus, Victor Bout, a prototype of Orlov, was named as the core element of military conflicts. Actually, the main conflict was in the desire of the governments to survive in the cruel modern world, full of military conflicts and political challenges. Different wars in different times were connected with the name of this trader. The military conflict in Afghanistans and his further help to Taliban. The main fictional character has no soul he sells weapon for killing innocent people as if he sells hotdogs or vacuum clean ers. It is claimed in the film that people gain profits from vast arms sales and from the taxes paying(a) by the arms manufacturers and the millions of money they employ (Smoking Guns, 2005). The sources of arms trafficking are intimidating the world, and in spite of drugs trafficking, these sources are often neglected. There are shallow relationships between arms traders, governments and arms manufacturers. This is terra incognita. This is a fertile make for gaining huge profits, a strong and powerful means to survive in the hostile and turbulent modern world (Smoking Guns, 2005). These guys, like Orlov, supply the governments with huge amounts of money and they are often released. These guys have no fear and there is a little bit of Orlov in every of us. This claim can be support in the following way it is appropriate in the modern society to survive by whatever means. There is no need to refer to moral norms or standardized principles of behavior (Smoking Guns, 2005). It is mu ch easier to go around up rules and remain safe, to create our own reality, to set up individuals norms and to gain money hand over fist and laugh at the victims of your game. This is the way Orlov acted. This claim can be